Does Jew-Hatred Win Elections for the Right?

A race in VA last week provides some answers

Why does Holocaust denial sell so well to the far-right? Why is the far-right so susceptible to it? Well, the obvious answer is that it’s an inherently anti-Jewish ideology; it paints Jews as the “fathers of the lie” who crafted a massive hoax to trick the world into seeing heroic Nazis as villains and villainous Jews as heroes.

The ADL, for what it’s worth (at the going rate, less than a street taco in East L.A.), stops there: “You’re a Holocaust denier because you hate Jews.”

But in the anti-denial book I’m working on, I go deeper, because there’s more to the issue than the ADL (with its motto “Let’s call pro-Israel mainstream conservatives who reject open borders and tranny ideology ‘hate criminals.’ There’s no way that’ll backfire on us!”) cedes.

I believe, and with my 35 years of knowing deniers I outrank you on this no matter who you are, that denial also appeals to humans who possess certain cognitive disabilities. I go into great detail about that in my book, and I don’t want to spoil it here, but there are specific cognitive flaws that all deniers share. These include an inability to mark the passing of time - hence why they think the Haavara Agreement occurred at the same time as the Holocaust, thus making the Holocaust unlikely: “Why wud they be killin’ Joos if they’s also sendin’ ‘em to Palerstein?” Hence why they think everything I said in 1992 is still my current thinking.

Because to them, it’s always 1992. Time never progresses.

Also, deniers don’t comprehend how to construct a solid case for an argument. They are uniquely unsuited to go from hypothesis to theory to accepted truth. That’s why, on X, nobody - and I mean nobody - cites the “intellectual” (scare-quotes not just intentional but required) deniers like Mattogno and Graf, the two boobs who’ve spent three decades writing word salads trying (and failing) to prove their hypothesis that the Jews murdered in the eastern occupied territories were in fact “resettled” in a happy little village (I call the “happy little village” Unicornville on account of its mythical nature).

See, Mattogno and Graf (and if you haven’t heard of them or know their first names, that proves my point. They’ve written four times more books than I…that even their own fans don’t read) mistakenly think they need to prove their case. They waste their lives looking for evidence of Unicornville because they possess just enough of a brain to know that proving their case is necessary in serious historiographical circles. But denial is not a “serious historiographical circle,” and deniers don’t need a “case” made because they don’t have minds to comprehend what a “case” is. They don’t need data; they don’t require documentary evidence. Just scream “WOODEN DOORTHS” and to them, the “case” is made.

When these people take over a historical field, and yes, deniers dominate and define Holocaust history on Musk’s X, the damage is felt by some more than others. The devolution of Holocaust historiography matters to me. But to some of my friends, it just doesn’t register. “History schmistory, all that matters to me is the battle against immigration! The fight to lock up criminals! Things that matter today, not in 1942.”

Fair enough. But what you’re missing, what you refuse to consider, is - what happens when a group of retards who are not only incapable of processing data but who achieve metaphysical certitude about an issue sans data, take over the right?

Here’s a warning you won’t heed: intellectual rightists (no scare quotes) are heading in the direction of David Irving. Irving, a very flawed historian to be sure but a good writer, spent his golden years in misery because his “base” stopped reading books. Again, for all his flaws, Irving was a great “discoverer of documents” and, as a wordsmith, a guy who could engage a reader for 926 pages. But starting in the early 1990s, back in my day, Irving was also the first to adopt “catchphrase Holocaust denial” - “Sink Battleship Auschwitz!” “No Holes, No Holocaust!” - and “shortcut revisionism” that bypassed documentary evidence for quick fixes like “there are no blue stains on the krema walls; that’s it! NO HOLOCAUST!”).

The only reason he never screamed “WOODEN DOORTHS” is that he hated the fact that I came up with it first (Irving was a very jealous man). And whereas I realized my faulty path and reversed course in 1994, trying to kill the “wooden doors” mania I started (spoiler: I failed), Irving doubled-down on his catch-phrases and shortcuts until his disaster of a defamation trial pantsed him before the world.

Irving trained a generation to become deniers by exchanging evidence for ad slogans. He couldn’t have foreseen memes, but he’s very much the father of them. Today’s deniers despise books; if it can’t fit on a meme, they don’t wanna know.

Cut to the 2010s and there’s Irving in the social media age, an old man trying to make a living selling books to people who only read memes. And before his mind gave out a few years ago, he lived in anger and bitterness, because he couldn’t fucking sell a single book.

I’ve known the guy 34 years, and our last correspondences were unbearable; an old, sick, 80-year-old man hauling a folding chair to Ye Olde Pigbottom Inn (Bumpton-on-Shropshire) hoping to sell enough books for the bus ride home.

And failing even at that.

Because even though Irving’s fans speak glowingly of him as a “genius” and “mentor,” they’ve no need to buy his books, because their “genius mentor” sold them on catchphrases and shortcuts.

Throughout his life Irving authored many things, most notably his own misfortune.

When today’s intellectual rightists turn a blind eye to the growth of Holocaust deniers on the right, they’re only looking at it from the POV of “okay, maybe this will effect Holocaust history, but the things I care about will be fine.”

That’s unfortunate. Because that loud, bullying demographic of deniers will bring their cognitive limitations with them. You can’t invite Rain Man for tea without also inviting his retardation. Of course, that will mean no more need for books. It will also mean no more need to “make a case,” because deniers lack the discernment to know a sound one from a flawed one.

But there’s a bigger, far more important issue beyond the death of the conservative book club.

When the right becomes flooded with people whose cognitive limitations prevent them from differentiating a strong evidentiary argument from a weak one, people like Ann Coulter and Steve Sailer, who’ve made their career out of talking sense to conservatives, will no longer be needed. Because sense won’t matter. And when sense stops mattering, elections will be lost. And we’ll be back to open borders and Sorosian crime policies.

What happens when the right’s loudest, youngest demographic - a demographic that doesn’t care about argument construction and lacks the cognitive ability to understand it anyway - takes over?

The risk regarding the Groypers isn’t that they’ll “usher in a new Holocaust of Jews.” It’s that their cognitive limitations will lose elections and eventually usher in a new era of open borders and crime….the things you care about.

I’ve attempted, in previous essays, to specifically illustrate that point. Mark “Black Hitler” Robinson’s defeat in NC. Royce “Holohoax” White’s defeat in Minnesota. Caroline “murder the Jews” Kane’s defeat in Texas CD-7. Gabrielle “sieg heil” Hanson’s defeat in an all-white all-red Tennessee town.

But many of you remain unpersuaded.

Christ…

Okay, the current messaging from Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, Poso, Cerno, Ian Carroll, “Comic” Dave Smith, etc., is that the Republican losses on November 4th occurred because the voting public hates Israel above all else and Americans are sick of ZIONISTS! And because the GOP didn’t adequately embrace the Groypers and condemn THE JEWS, the party was punished by voters.

That’s literally the Carlson/Owens/Fuentes line. If the GOP had merely condemned Zionists, the party would’ve won every race last week.

Cerno’s position?

Cerno’s view is that Trump did nothing all year except concentrate on the Middle East, and because of that, the GOP got swept.

Do you believe that? Huh? Do you? That Trump did nothing in 2025 except obsess over the Middle East?

No record-level deportations, no ICE sweeps and riots, no “remain in Mexico,” no Operation Tidal Wave, no end to “catch and release,” no executive orders on “criminal illegal aliens,” no Birthright Citizenship executive order, no tariffs, no National Guard sent to crime-ridden cities, no DOGE, no Big Beautiful Bill and Laken Riley Act, no blowing up Venezuelan drug boats, no SCOTUS victory against tranny passports, no anti-tranny Title IX reform, no defunding PBS and NPR, no executive orders on nuclear energy and coal, no mass pardon of J6ers, etc. etc.

Nope - Trump spent the entire year doing nothing but obsessing over the Middle East.

Do you believe that? You must. Because none of the Trump fans I know, none of the people who fret about immigration, crime, trannies, and J6, have countered Cerno’s claim. So you must find it convincing.

Or…

You’re cowards. I don’t even like Trump…why am I the only one defending his fat ass against Cerno’s lie?

Oh, because I don’t give two shits about losing Groyper followers.

That’s why.

Cerno wasn’t the only one spreading the myth that Trump has done nothing in 2025 except obsess over Israel. Vile, corrupt “pollster” Mark Mitchell of right-skewing Rasmussen claimed that Trump has been too busy serving Israel to serve voters’ interests:

Mitchell, a liar by trade, claims that those trashing Tucker for platforming Nazis “don’t believe voters’ interests should come first.”

In other words, Mitchell believes that voters’ interests are served by platforming Nazis.

This was echoed by Groyper fanatic and Nick Fuentes dicksucker Clint Russell (271k X followers):

So we have a clear assertion: voters rejected the GOP because it’s too pro-Israel. If the GOP platformed more Jew-haters who embrace Fuentes, it would never lose an election.

Holocaust-denying Groyper “comic” Dave Smith stated it plainly: the GOP lost last week because “Instead of America First, we got Israel first instead” (he’s no comic, but his redundancy is hilarious).

See, this is why these retards love Holocaust denial. Denial relies on a cognitive inability to make a solid case for a claim. Historians lay out thousands of pages of evidence for the Holocaust; there may be errors here and there, but overall, the focus is on making the case.

Deniers just post memes saying “WOODEN DOORS” and “SHUT UP, JEW,” and to them, that is “making a case.”

Can any of these I Am Sams - Cerno, Fuentes, Smith, Russell, Mitchell - back up their claim that Israel was the reason for last week’s losses?

They don’t even try. Because half their audience is fellow morons who lack the intellectual acuity to interpret data, and the other half is cowards scared shitless of offending the morons (God forbid they lose 100 followers!).

But in fact there is no case to be made. Gallup’s pre-election polling, just like the polling of Pew, Quinnipiac, and Emerson, clearly shows that the economy was the runaway #1 voter concern last week, with "poor leadership” and immigration coming in at #2 and #3.

The Middle East ranked as “statistically irrelevant.”

Weird…that polling data is good news for immigration foes. You’d think they’d be the first to vocally challenge Cerno, Fuentes, Smith, Russell, Mitchell et al. You’d think immigration foes would be on the FRONT LINES of pushing back against the claim that it’s the Middle East not immigration that voters are worried about.

If only I could solve the puzzle…why are normally headstrong immigration restrictionists sitting back and allowing their key issue to be dismissed in importance by Groypers?

Oh, wait - puzzle solved. Cowardice! “Fuck immigration; I don’t wanna lose 100 followers!”

But still - Gallup might be, you know, CONTROLLED BY THE ZIONISTS! If only the matter of Israel could be directly put before the voters. Then we’d see how IMPORTANT it is to them!

Well surprise surprise surprise you fucking Gomers…the matter was put before the voters last week.

Let’s see how it fared.

Virginia House of Delegates (their high-falutin’ faggoty version of a House of Representatives) District 16 used to be decently Republican until redistricting put it in play for the Dems. Indeed, the Dem running for reelection last week, Paul Krizek, was fully expected to win.

But here’s the interesting part. There were two candidates vying for the district’s conservatives: former Naval officer and conservative activist Shelly Arnoldi, running as an independent, and Richard Hayden, a man with not a single credit to his name except “Catholic grandpa,” running as a Republican.

These were the two candidates vying for whoever didn’t want to vote for the pro-immigrant pro-tranny pro-gun control Democrat Krizek.

Let’s look at Shelly Arnoldi first.

Attractive enough beast, to be sure. And she’s as pretty on the inside as she is on the outside, if by “pretty” you mean “Nazi.” Arnoldi is defined by one issue and one issue alone: hatred of Jews and Israel.

I’ll let a small sampling of her tweets speak for themselves:

She ain’t no fan of Jew-run Hollywood…

The only film she likes is “Israel’s Second 9/11,” which claims that Jews killed JFK, RFK, and JFK Jr.(!), engineered 9/11, then conducted a coup to create “one-world ZOG government” with Washington D.C. as its figurehead:

Yes, she promotes that film a LOT.

She also don’t care for Holocaust “brainwashing:”

She frequently retweets Stew Peters, a large-following Nazi (860k) who advocates for a “Final Solution to the Jewish Question in the U.S.,” and who has called for taking up arms to “physically fight” the Jews:

And you can just scroll through the rest…

Have I made my point? Because I realize that regarding anti-Jewishness, some of you, even a few of the smartest of you, become really thick when it comes to seeing what’s right in front of your face. But thick as you may be, have I at least made the point that Arnoldi is anti-Israel? Will you at least cede that much, you willfully blind assholes?

Indeed, right before the election Arnoldi got a huge publicity boost when her words were retweeted by several large-following pro-Israel accounts:

By November 4th, nobody paying attention to the District 16 race was in the dark about Arnoldi’s views.

Now, the other candidate vying for those who didn’t want the lefty Dem was Richard Hayden…a man so unknown he couldn’t even supply a photo to Ballotpedia.

I found one on his Facebook page…because all Boomers have Facebook pages:

Hayden’s sole credit - “Catholic grandpa.” His sole issue: right-to-life.

Arnoldi: 5,485 followers on X.

Hayden: 22 followers on X.

Not 22k.

22.

As in, 11 + 11.

So, here’s our Petri dish, a race where we can objectively gauge the Groyper claim that an anti-Israel platform is the key to victory.

Two candidates opposing the lefty Dem.

Shelly Arnoldi: Naval officer, vehemently anti-Israel. Active X presence giving her tons of free publicity, large-following Jewish accounts giving her the same.

Richard Hayden: A nobody. No job, no photos, no positions beyond right-to-life, no X followers, no lovers or haters, no publicity at all.

In theory, Arnoldi should’ve bested Old Man Anon. If Cerno, Fuentes, Smith, Russell, Mitchell, Carlson, Fuentes, Kelly, Owens, and Carroll are correct, if the voters (or at least rightist, right-center, and GOP-leaning voters) want TOUGH ON ISRAEL, then Arnoldi should’ve grabbed the lion’s share of the non-Dem vote.

Oh, wait…

Face the data, you cowardly losers: Out of a grand total of 25,164 votes, Arnoldi scored 634. It wasn’t even a showing.

As I said, nobody expected her to beat the Dem. But she should’ve at least been competitive to the fossil with no photo, especially with her online and social media advantages.

Nobody liked her message. The Groypers are wrong. You’re being tricked into thinking that it’s the anti-Nazis who are costing you votes, but it’s the opposite. Jew-Hatred, Israel-hatred, sells in the fetid Democrat Somali toilets of Minnesota and the “American ghetto meets Third World grotto” of NYC.

It doesn’t sell to rightist, center-right, or independent voters. We who are fervently attempting to talk you dumbasses out of platforming Nazis are trying to help. We’re trying to prevent GOP defeats. Anyone who suggests otherwise is either a Nazi or Nazi sympathizer themselves, or (more likely) a chickenshit coward who doesn’t want to lose followers on X, a platform ruled by the Groyper mob.

As long as there have been countries, there have been traitors who sell theirs out. But this is the first time in history a nation is being sold out for likes and follows.

AI traitors seeking virtual rewards.

Not even for 30 pieces of silver.

Just 30 retweets.

Ol’ Dave truly appreciates a few bucks in the tip jar (Buy Me a Beer, GiveSendGo). The bad guys are winning; help support the opposing voices.